IFR 2021 Season

We took the difficult decision to cancel the 2020 field season, and we are running a third of our typical program offerings this coming season. Though we are optimistic about the 2021 season, IFR is poised to react to field schools cancelling and protecting students financially. Go or No-Go decisions will be made approximately 5 weeks prior most of our field schools, at which point we will advise students to book their airline tickets and, if they wish, purchase trip cancellation insurance. If circumstance change dramatically after the Go or No-Go time, rendering your field school unable to operate this season, IFR will cancel the program and students will be fully refunded. Go or No-Go decisions will be made in consultation with Anthony Graesch and Angela Susak Pitzer and will be based on enrollment numbers but also the feasibility of the field school operating based on travel restrictions, health and safety concerns, and the overall risk to all parties involved.

An IFR field school is designed to provide positive, transformative experiences for communities, students, and researchers. The following protocols have been developed based on the assumption that any participant in an IFR field school may be an asymptomatic carrier of SARS COVID-19. Our goal, with these protocols, is to reduce the possibility for COVID-19 transmission among participants, staff, and local community members. IFR depends on the complete and sustained commitment of all our cohorts to stay healthy and help others stay healthy, and this is reflected in the following commitments:

IFR COMMITMENT

Communications and Case Management

A1. IFR will staff a COVID-19 hotline +1-424-226-6983 for PIs to immediately call if anyone at a field school exhibits symptoms, is violating the COVID-19 conduct protocols, or tests positive for COVID-19.

A2. IFR will coordinate with field school directors and assess US State Department guidelines in order to greenlight programs six weeks before the start date of the field school so students can make final travel arrangements. 

A3. IFR will require all enrolled participants to submit a negative RT-PCR test for COVID-19 72 hours prior to arrival at their field school through their application portal. 

Financial and Material Resources

A4. IFR will set aside a COVID-19 contingency allocation from IFR resources of 5% of field school costs to each field school to mitigate their COVID-19 prevention or mitigation expenditures. 

A5. Students will pay for their own additional PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) as well as any pre-program quarantine costs and other expenses that may arise as a result of changing local policies.

A6. IFR will provide each field school a COVID-19 testing kit of thermometer and pulse oximeter.

A7. IFR will create an escrow fund of student fees for refunds in the event schools are cancelled (due to COVID-19).

A8. Insurance provided by IFR does not offer evacuation coverage for pandemics/epidemics.The DRUM coverage is for political, security, and natural disaster evacuation coverage. The GeoBlue policy would cover any medically necessary medical evacuation related to an illness (including COVID-19) or injury if the person cannot be appropriately treated locally. The GeoBlue medical plan would also cover medical costs associated with someone becoming ill or injured and being quarantined in a hospital/medical setting for a diagnosed illness/injury. It would not cover preventative self-quarantine in a hotel, cruise ship, or other location or the related expenses such as meals, etc.

Note: Local circumstances, such as remote locations with no community interactions where it is possible to sustain working and living in “pods/bubbles”  may permit adjustment to the below on-site policies. PIs should submit such details to IFR for review.

FIELD SCHOOL/PROGRAM DIRECTORS’ COMMITMENT

Prior to start of field school

B1. Program Directors to add their field school-specific COVID-19 protocols to the IFR minimum standards (via a  2021 syllabus addendum). The following organizational minimum protocols will be listed:

  1. All participants in a field school, students and staff, will wear masks while indoors (i.e., during lectures, labs, etc.).
  2. Regular hand washing must be a part of the project’s daily schedule.
  3. Interaction with the local community must be limited to situations where everyone can maintain the required 6-foot/2-meter physical distance, wear masks, and ideally be outside.
  4. Participants must be tested for COVID-19 and quarantine on site as required by local jurisdiction.

B2. Prior to and throughout the field school, Program Directors will monitor and communicate to program participants and the IFR (individually, via email and the hotline) any changes in local conditions that impact student travel and safe participation, and will update the syllabus addendum accordingly

B3. Eight weeks before the start of the field school the IFR and enrolled students must receive final site-specific COVID-19 Testing, Quarantine & Healthcare processes and requirements. 

B4. In the event your location (country) requires quarantine on arrival, Program Directors must provide students with information and meaningful resources on locations for quarantine prior to the start of the field school so students can make necessary arrangements. Students will be responsible for any additional costs associated with the quarantine. 

B5. Eight weeks before the start of the field school, enrolled students must receive a list of the specific PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) and other items including individual equipment that must be brought to the field in order to support COVID-19 safety measures.

Note: Field School PIs are urged to review the practical recommendations provided by the National Outdoor Leadership Schools COVID-19 Practices at https://www.nols.edu/en/covid19-practices/ or recommendations from their local similar resources.


During the field school program

B6. PI must share details (to be communicated in the syllabus addendum) on planned testing, on-site quarantine, and health care arrangements specifically related to an outbreak on site — once the field school has started.

B7. In the event that local conditions and/or government regulations addressing COVID-19 change, Program Directors should provide students with support — time, resources, and logistical help — in order to ensure that the students can make appropriate return travel arrangements. However, any additional costs for early returns are the responsibility of the student.

B8. Ensure students and staff review and sign the site’s COVID-19 protocol document and review the field school’s final COVID-19 Testing, Quarantine, & Healthcare Process including daily symptoms checks, periodic testing, etc.

B9. Failure by students or staff to follow the COVID-19 policy of the field school is cause for removal. Students or staff may be required to leave the field school at their own cost and without refund. PI must report to and get prior approval of IFR if they believe a student must be dismissed for violating COVID-19 protocol. 

B10. Provide COVID-19-appropriate dining and lodging for staff and students to ensure appropriate indoor social distancing. Such accommodations might be single or low-occupancy rooms for the duration of the program, or the isolation of program participants in “pods,” among other possibilities. Details are to be provided in the syllabus addendum.

B11. If a student develops symptoms of COVID-19, they must be isolated from the group. Staff will seek medical advice and follow IFR’s COVID-19 illness guidelines, which may include evacuation from the course. If a student is evacuated, it is possible they will be able to rejoin their course due to remoteness and logistics. 

B12. Program must provide access to water and soap and/or sanitizer gel for all program participants to frequently wash and sanitize hands.

STUDENT COMMITMENT

Prior to start of field school

C1. Students are strongly urged to obtain travel/trip insurance from a reputable source that will provide refunds for travel and program (tuition) costs in the event that participation is denied because of COVID-19. 

C2. Students commit to comply with all aspects of the COVID-19 avoidance policy, and additional policies of their respective IFR field school. Students will be provided with a waiver that will enable sharing of testing outcomes and an agreement that the student acknowledges their personal responsibility for two outcomes: (1) stemming the transmission of COVID-19 as indicated by the local conditions at this field school, and (2) acting in ways that serve to protect from exposure members of both the field school and the community in which we are working. Specifically,

C3. Students must review and sign a written copy of COVID-19 avoidance policy.

C4. Students must sign a document stating that they received and read the protocol and that they agree to follow the protocol that, at a minimum, will include:

  1. All participants in a field school, students and staff, will wear masks while indoors (i.e. during lectures, labs, etc.).
  2. Regular hand washing must be a part of the project’s daily schedule.
  3. Interaction with the local community must be limited to situations where everyone can maintain the required 6-foot/2 meter physical distance, wear masks, and ideally be outside.
  4. Participants must be tested for COVID-19 and quarantine on site as required by local jurisdiction.

C5. Students must arrange a test for current infection for COVID-19 through a RT-PCR test for themselves in their home location 72 hours prior to arrival at the destination and upload proof of negative result to their IFR application portal. If the test is positive prior to arriving at your field school, you will not be able to attend the field school and  your IFR deposit will not be refunded nor will any travel change fees be refunded by IFR. This issue will be finalized in the near term by IFR’s BOG.

C6. Students must take all precautions possible to ensure they remain COVID-19 free during their travel to the field school after demonstrating they tested negative. (Additional details will be provided nearer to the time of travel at a minimum, however, this means that they will wear a mask during all travel, wash hands and, in so far as possible, maintain social distances). 

C7.  Students must commit in writing to understanding that their travel during the pandemic is uncertain and the situation might change suddenly. Students are therefore responsible for being familiar with and meeting any travel restrictions (e.g., quarantine at destination, transit airport issues) prior to their arrival at the field location, and coordinating with their field school Program director to access available resources. Students must plan accordingly to protect themselves with adequate travel insurance and funds as required in addition to IFR fees. 

During the field school program

 C9. In the event that local conditions, regulations and/or government policies addressing COVID-19 change, students will check-in with Program Directors for support — logistical help in order to ensure that they can make appropriate return travel arrangements.

C10. Students must commit to adhering to the field program’s dining and lodging arrangements for staff and students (in pods if necessary) to ensure appropriately distanced living indoors. 

C11. Participate in the review of the COVID-19 protocol and practices at the site and sign the waiver again if required.

C12. Strictly adhere to the program’s requirements limiting interaction with outside community members only as permitted by the program.

C13. Students must refrain from touching their nose, mouth, and eyes and must practice frequent and thorough hand washing or sanitizing throughout the duration of the field school. All participants must sanitize shared and frequently touched surfaces (i.e., total station) between uses. 

C14. Students must note and accept that failure to follow the COVID-19 policy of the field school is cause for removal. Students or staff may be required to leave the field school at their own cost, without refund, and could be disqualified from receiving academic credit for the program. PI must report to and get the prior approval of IFR if they believe a student must be dismissed for violating COVID protocols.

International Programs:

For Emergencies, please complete all the following steps immediately:

  1. Call local emergency services: 112
  2. Call GeoBlue
  3. Contact the IFR Hotline
  4. IFR will contact the Medical Director, Dr. Kurt Eifling

For Minor Injuries and Illness:

  1. Contact GeoBlue
  2. Contact the IFR Hotline
  3. IFR will contact the Medical Director, Dr. Kurt Eifling

For Domestic Programs:

For Emergencies, please complete all the following steps immediately:

  1. Call local emergency services: 911
  2. Contact the IFR Hotline
  3. IFR will contact the Medical Director, Dr. Kurt Eifling
  4. Call Insurance (number on back of insurance card)

For Minor Injuries and Illness:

  1. Contact the IFR Hotline
  2. IFR will contact the Medical Director, Dr. Kurt Eifling
  3. Call insurance (number on back of insurance card) to find a local doctor or urgent care facility

Your Content Goes Here

IFR Contact Information
  • Phone: +1 (424) 209-1173

  • Address: 1855 Industrial St. Unit 106, Los Angeles, California, USA 90021

  • 24/7 hotline: +1 (424) 226-6983

Dr. Kurt Eifling
Dr. Kurt Eifling Medical Director
Dr. Eifling’s role in the 2021 season will be to provide guidance to students and PIs in how best to prepare for the field and operate in a manner that manages health and safety risks appropriately. Programs Directors are welcomed to contact Dr. Eifling directly with their concerns and review prior responses to questions posed by other PIs.

Medical Director Reports

To what degree do the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines reduce transmission rates? 

In the Jan 23rd IFR meeting, I pumped up the data we’re expecting from Israel. Their nation has  a peculiar combination of features that allow them to do things like mass vaccinations very  effectively, so I was kind of looking forward to this. First wave of data came out Feb 7th. I don’t  typically use data like these in my clinical practice—the methodology of this paper was pretty  foreign to me, but appears to be sound when comparing its measurement techniques with other  molecular biology sources. The measure of major interest here, “Ct”, is short for “cycle  threshold,” which is a quantitative measure of how much nucleic acid material was actually on  your swab. This measure gives not just the boolean “positive/negative” result, but a quantitative  description of “just how positive was that positive?” This measure, Ct, will be the first variable  discussed in studying the reductions of transmissibility; the second will be tracking  changes in actual clinical spread

Here’s a decent description of the paper: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/coronavirus-covid-19-pfizer-vaccine-may-reduce-transmission 

And here’s the source paper itself, not having yet undergone peer review: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.08.21251329v1.full.pdf

For those who have been vaccinated with the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines, what do we know so far about their rate of asymptomatic infection, or their ability to spread COVID-19 virus to others? 

Is a vaccinated student a safe student to put with host nationals who are not vaccinated? What about vice-versa? 

My overall answer is that yes, the vaccinated can still harbor and spread virus; to what degree is unclear; it will be vastly more clear by March or April, in time for IFR’s go/no-go decision points. Vaccines began Dec 18th in the US, so the second doses have been in patients for just barely a month now. The data we need is currently being collected. For now we can go product-by-product because there are just three of these released in the west. But India is already shipping millions of doses of another to lower and middle income countries, and there are 50-something more vaccines in development. Pretty soon this will be a sloshing sea of clinical trial data, hopefully with WHO tracking it in tables for us. (Please, oh please?) For now we can say it looks like Moderna studied this a little better than the other producers did, and we can likely take their numbers as an indicator of what to expect from the high-performing products. 

Moderna tracked daily PCRs after test subjects received either vaccine dose one or placebo—indeed some from each group developed positive test results in the days following. The nature of the mRNA vaccine would not be expected to turn the sample positive, suggesting true viral particles were present to make the PCRs positive. However, those who got true vaccine were 2/3 less likely to develop positive PCRs after a first dose of vaccine compared with the placebo group. In short, it cuts back on asymptomatic carrying significantly, but not entirely. For more on this, see page 49 of “Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting December 17, 2020, FDA Briefing Document, Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine.” 

Pfizer didn’t check this, but they plan to get back to you shortly… 

Oxford-AstraZeneca had a safety/efficacy trial with some errors that rendered the numbers hard to interpret. Their confidence intervals were vast, showing even possible harm by raising the rate of asymptomatic infection. Again, likely due to flawed methodology, not a dangerous product. So they tried to measure post-vaccination asymptomatic infection, regrettably made a hash of it, but are expecting more data soon. Due to their nonprofit mission, we hope to see that data from deployments in a greater variety of geographic locations than the other western producers. For those programs running in lower and middle income countries, the Oxford-AstraZeneca product is the most likely of these three to be deployed. Its cost will be by far the lowest, and it enjoys good temperature stability, only needing a regular freezer for cold chain. For more on this, see “Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine efficacy”a comment in The Lancet, December 8, 2020.

In our recent conversations with the High School principal we work with, he was concerned  that his students (who often intern with us) won’t have been vaccinated by the start of the field  school (tentatively set at July 12). Do you think it would be safe to bring them in as interns  (given that they won’t be sharing our living space like the students)? We will of course be  following the IFR requirements for masking / social distancing.  

Vaccines will unlikely be approved for use in those under 16 years old before the 2021 field  season. Pfizer was authorized in December for use in those 16 and older; Moderna is currently  18 and over. Both Pfizer and Moderna are working trials now with children down to 12 years  old. Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca, and Novavax are well behind Pfizer/Moderna and  should not be considered “in play” for students under age 18 in the 2021 field season. You may  get lucky and find that 70-90% of your field camp is either immunized or convalescent, thus  creating an immune herd that can more safely accommodate those younger people. So in that  scenario it depends on (1) the proportion of the interns to others, and (2) the prevalence of  immunization in the rest of the program participants. 

The biggest caveat here is that we’re still in the dark about transmission after vaccination. We  know lots about death & critical illness, because that’s what these trials and FDA approvals  were scrutinizing. The other endpoint that’s of huge concern to field school leadership, is to  avoid creating a super-spreader event, or for anyone to get to camp healthy and then fall ill.  That’s our mutual nightmare, and this particular nightmare remains largely unstudied. As  discussed above, we believe the vaccines will be protective against COVID spreading within  your camp, but we still don’t know how good they really are for that. Moreover, the ever widening array of variants may change that impact, depending on the strain that lands in your  camp. Despite a lack of some data I want, vaccinations will be considered “best practice” in  bringing the safest cohort possible to the field, and certainly supportive of the ethical duty you  have to community elders. We likely still won’t know just how helpful vaccines are in preventing 

the spread of COVID, so a sound focus on the fundamentals of testing, cohorting, masking &  distancing should remain at the core of your preparations. 

I would be glad to talk more about the interns’ role and physical interactions with the research  subjects. I think you can set up a “cohort” of interns if their safety profile is different from  others, and thereby maintain some administrative control their interactions with the field  school. The New York Times did a good piece on Feb 12th about kids and vaccines. 

We typically have our dinners made by a local home-economics teacher who makes the  meals in the crew house kitchen. So long as she is vaccinated and follows safe food handling  procedures, do you think it would be appropriate for us to have her cook?  

Yes! Food service is essential, and your setup sounds enviable. Your overall safety profile  improves in a field kitchen setting if you have fewer, well-trained people interacting with the  food service responsibilities. Even in the age of COVID, we have to remember the  fundamentals: nothing is more basic & humiliating than viral gastroenteritis smashing its way  through a field camp setting due to poor food safety practices. Think of food safety first, then  dining safety next. Lucky for you, the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment  publishes guidelines for restaurants, and county-by-county risk level assessments that can  help you treat your own dining area the way the state would expect you to treat it if you were a  restaurant. See which of those you can use, or if your physical plant requires us to come at this  a totally different way.

Instructions to Review Applicants

To review applications, you may log into our portal here with your email address. And if you have forgotten your password or do not have one yet, please select “Forgot Password?” and it will send you a link to your email address.

Once you login, you may select the My Reviews tab on the left. This will show you “Outstanding Applications” and “All Applications”. Outstanding Applications are ones that have been assigned to you that you have not yet reviewed, and All Applications will include all applications that have been assigned to you, including those you have already reviewed. The application overview in My Review should show reviews at the bottom so that you may know if you or another PI has reviewed the applicant already.

 

image.png

In order to review applicants, you can click on their last name which will open the reviewer summary and the review form. A summary of the applicant’s responses, uploaded files and recommendations are displayed in the center of the screen. The review form is displayed on the right side of the screen:

image.png

Once you have completed all of the required fields, you can then click the Mark Complete button in order to submit your review. A green box with a checkmark and “success” will show up in the bottom right hand corner of the screen. Or if you need to complete your review at another time, you may click the Save button which will save any responses you have entered at that point:

image.png

The “Applications Grid” tab on the left will show other information about the applicants assigned to you, including the day they submitted their application. You may only review an applicant after they have submitted. If the student has admin: student deferred status as “yes”, then they are a deferred student who paid a deposit or tuition in 2020. We would like you to please give these applicants priority during the review process, since they have left their deposit with IFR in hopes to have priority in being placed in a program this year.

The admitted students are the ones with both Admin: Status as “Accepted” and Admin: Payment Status as “Deposit paid” or “Tuition paid”.